Home Login Register
Poll
Question: 2-D Zeldas or 3-D Zeldas?
2-D. All the way! Old school! - 5 (29.4%)
3-D. Welcome to the 21st Century - 12 (70.6%)
Total Voters: 17

Pages: [1]   Go Down
   
Author Topic: 2-D or not 2-D...  (Read 1719 times)
Offline Ezlo's Apprentice

ThornSpell47
*

Posts: 6,996


WWW
« on: January 23, 2007 »

That is indeed the question.

Just another random poll for you folks. I do like a good poll. Do we prefer the 2-D Zeldas or the 3-D Zeldas?

FTR:
2-D= LoZ, AoL, LTTP, LA, OoA, OoS, MC, FS/FSA
3-D= OoT, MM, WW, TP

I think that while the 3-D games do have a far deeper presentation, I enjoy the 2-D ones far more. I can't full explain it. It may just be the fact that I've played the Oracles and TP recently, and enjoyed Oracles a lot more...
Logged


Basil | Logan | Skipper | Scarial | Wattson | Daboodee



104 days, 9 hours and 34 minutes
Offline GAMEFREAK

Sage of Forest
*

Ragnarok


Posts: 1,929


« #1 on: January 23, 2007 »

Quote from: EzlosApprentice;16374
That is indeed the question.

Just another random poll for you folks. I do like a good poll. Do we prefer the 2-D Zeldas or the 3-D Zeldas?

FTR:
2-D= LoZ, AoL, LTTP, LA, OoA, OoS, MC, FS/FSA
3-D= OoT, MM, WW, TP

I think that while the 3-D games do have a far deeper presentation, I enjoy the 2-D ones far more. I can't full explain it. It may just be the fact that I've played the Oracles and TP recently, and enjoyed Oracles a lot more...


i agree 100%

i am about to start oracle of ages.  i played a bit before and i liked its puzzles. i sadly never finished it and decided i would do that now.  i liked what i played was better than TP too.
Logged

Offline Eater

Sage of Light
*

Posts: 775


« #2 on: January 23, 2007 »

I'm not exactly sure.  While I enjoy 3D envirements, mostly it depends on the quality.  For an example, OoT was 3D and all, but could have been better for a 3D game, while I feel that TMC was better, and yet was in 2D.
Logged

"The dog that barks never bites."
Offline rkfs

Goron
*

Posts: 214


« #3 on: January 23, 2007 »

I'm indifferent.
Logged
Offline Ezlo's Apprentice

ThornSpell47
*

Posts: 6,996


WWW
« #4 on: January 23, 2007 »

Quote from: Eater;16658
I'm not exactly sure.  While I enjoy 3D envirements, mostly it depends on the quality.  For an example, OoT was 3D and all, but could have been better for a 3D game, while I feel that TMC was better, and yet was in 2D.


I love my 2-D games, but I can't possibly ever believe that MC beats OoT. Wow....
Logged


Basil | Logan | Skipper | Scarial | Wattson | Daboodee



104 days, 9 hours and 34 minutes
Offline Eater

Sage of Light
*

Posts: 775


« #5 on: January 23, 2007 »

Why not?
Logged

"The dog that barks never bites."
Offline Ezlo's Apprentice

ThornSpell47
*

Posts: 6,996


WWW
« #6 on: January 23, 2007 »

OoT completely blew me away at the time, and even today still plays well. It was so immersive, detailed and full of life- particularly for its time.

MC was a little too short for my liking, and while it was good isn't an OoT beater.
Logged


Basil | Logan | Skipper | Scarial | Wattson | Daboodee



104 days, 9 hours and 34 minutes
Offline Hyruleansoldier

Twilight Dreamlander
*

The Paradox of Kirby: Suckage = Ownage ^_^


Posts: 7,535


« #7 on: January 23, 2007 »

I have only just cast my vote... I actually had to think about this for the last 2 hours.

While the 2-D games MADE Zelda into what it is now, boasting a great number of games, each with their good, great and sublime traits, I have chosen the 3-D Zelda's for the impact OOT made for the Zelda series, and the continued patronage in my no.2 favorite MM, and also in my top 5 TWW & TP.

It was a close call though. I'm a terribly nostalgic person. If I would put all my scores for the 2-D and the 3-D Zelda games together, the 3-D games would still win, but not by THAT much.  Still, I love(d) this thread
Logged

Offline Shin Illuminated

Department store hero
*

Posts: 1,581


« #8 on: January 23, 2007 »

Quote from: EzlosApprentice;16374
I do like a good poll.

Then why did you make this one?
Logged
Offline Ezlo's Apprentice

ThornSpell47
*

Posts: 6,996


WWW
« #9 on: January 23, 2007 »

Quote from: Illuminated;16678
Then why did you make this one?


To get pointless, mindless posts like that obviously.... >.>

What's wrong with this?
Logged


Basil | Logan | Skipper | Scarial | Wattson | Daboodee



104 days, 9 hours and 34 minutes
Offline Hyruleansoldier

Twilight Dreamlander
*

The Paradox of Kirby: Suckage = Ownage ^_^


Posts: 7,535


« #10 on: January 23, 2007 »

@Illuminated

Gee... What about... Not showing yourself in posts that you couldn't give less about?!
Why messing with people's shine?
I, for one, like this poll-thread. And that's why I am *here*. I don't know why you are...
Logged

Offline Shin Illuminated

Department store hero
*

Posts: 1,581


« #11 on: January 23, 2007 »

Boredom can make a person do cruel things...

But to play along...I could take either or.
Logged
Offline Wiired

Goron
*

Posts: 156


« #12 on: January 23, 2007 »

Might I say your poll choices kind of lean people into 2-D.

I chose 3-D, of course. TP and OoT are my first and second favorite games of all time, respectively. I do love the 2-D ones, of course, but if I had to choose to get rid of one and keep the other it would be 2-D.
Logged


Offline bastian

Goron
*

Posts: 249


« #13 on: January 23, 2007 »

I can't vote because there's no middle answer.

They are like two completely different styles of games, and they each have their positives and negatives.. I like both styles equallly.
Logged

"But this is America, where we unappologetically bastardize other countries' cultures in a gross quest for moral and military supremecy." ~Amy Sherman-Palladino
Offline Ezlo's Apprentice

ThornSpell47
*

Posts: 6,996


WWW
« #14 on: January 23, 2007 »

Quote from: bastian;16719
I can't vote because there's no middle answer.


I was hoping people could push themselves into finding that one they truly did prefer above all. My bad.

Quote from: Wiired
Might I say your poll choices kind of lean people into 2-D

It's the lack of an exclamation mark at the end of the 3-D option that does it...
Logged


Basil | Logan | Skipper | Scarial | Wattson | Daboodee



104 days, 9 hours and 34 minutes
Offline Ezlo's Apprentice

ThornSpell47
*

Posts: 6,996


WWW
« #15 on: January 30, 2007 »

Well, time to revisit another old thread.

I have completed my trip through Holodrum and Labrynna again, and have to say the Oracles trump TP completely. There just seems to be a greater level of diversity in the game, a more satisfying conclusion to the overall two-game story arc, and particularly the boss fights felt more rewarding.

Example: Onox in OoS vs Dark Beast Ganon in TP. I spent an age attacking Onox with my boomerang and super slingshot before realising it wasn't gonna work. Worked out TP Ganon's weakness in seconds. The glowing gem was sort of a giveaway...
Logged


Basil | Logan | Skipper | Scarial | Wattson | Daboodee



104 days, 9 hours and 34 minutes
Offline Hyruleansoldier

Twilight Dreamlander
*

The Paradox of Kirby: Suckage = Ownage ^_^


Posts: 7,535


« #16 on: January 30, 2007 »

Quote from: EzlosApprentice;20869
Well, time to revisit another old thread.

I have completed my trip through Holodrum and Labrynna again, and have to say the Oracles trump TP completely. There just seems to be a greater level of diversity in the game, a more satisfying conclusion to the overall two-game story arc, and particularly the boss fights felt more rewarding.

Example: Onox in OoS vs Dark Beast Ganon in TP. I spent an age attacking Onox with my boomerang and super slingshot before realising it wasn't gonna work. Worked out TP Ganon's weakness in seconds. The glowing gem was sort of a giveaway...


Bosses in the 2D games are nearly ALWAYS more difficult than the 3D uns. The 3D uns are mostly just spectacular-looking. Though there are examples in both camps, I generally favor 2D bosses in terms of challenge. LOZ, AOL, ALTTP, OOA/OOS bosses anyone? Right.

Onox I really liked. Veran was great too, both as a boss and a character. Should continue my Oracle ventures again soon, it's the Zelda's I left of at before I got my jolly Wii.
Logged

Offline Eater

Sage of Light
*

Posts: 775


« #17 on: January 30, 2007 »

Quote from: Hyruleansoldier;20876
Bosses in the 2D games are nearly ALWAYS more difficult than the 3D uns. The 3D uns are mostly just spectacular-looking. Though there are examples in both camps, I generally favor 2D bosses in terms of challenge. LOZ, AOL, ALTTP, OOA/OOS bosses anyone? Right.

Onox I really liked. Veran was great too, both as a boss and a character. Should continue my Oracle ventures again soon, it's the Zelda's I left of at before I got my jolly Wii.


Meh, I thought most of the bosses in ALttP were easy.  I only had trouble with the second and third bosses, Blind the theif, and Ganon, and now, the later two aren't too chellenging, if you use four bottles filled with blue potion or the Magic Cape.
Logged

"The dog that barks never bites."
Offline Haru to Ashura

Sage of Light
*

bringin sexy back


Posts: 925


« #18 on: January 31, 2007 »

Indifferent.  It's not what makes the game great.  Based on different technology and different platforms (home console vs. portable gaming) it's unfair to compare the different mediums, really.
Logged

Pages: [1]   Go Up
   
 
Jump to:  

Powered by SMF 1.1.16 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines
Page created in 0.034 seconds with 23 queries.