Rew
The Hylian Grammarian
Subjecting innocents to Vogon poetry since 1980.
Posts: 1,750
|
|
« #162960 on: May 13, 2012 » |
|
173,560.
So was Manchester the team that won the championship today for the first time in 50-odd years? Who did they beat?
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
hisak
Sage of Shadow
Posts: 4,702
|
|
« #162961 on: May 13, 2012 » |
|
173,561
Q something.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Rew
The Hylian Grammarian
Subjecting innocents to Vogon poetry since 1980.
Posts: 1,750
|
|
« #162962 on: May 13, 2012 » |
|
173,562. I can't think of any British town that starts with a Q. 
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Ezlo's Apprentice
ThornSpell47
Posts: 6,993
|
|
« #162963 on: May 13, 2012 » |
|
173,563
In short: Manchester City. Beat QPR (Queen's Park Rangers. They're a London side. One of half a dozen in the Premier League.)
In more detail: There are two Manchester teams. Manchester United who were looking to win their third title in a row (and their 13th in 20 years) and Manchester City, who until recent heavy investment from a Middle Eastern tycoon and several high profile, high cost player purchases had had a 44 year trophyless run. Until today, City were little more than the noisy neighbours.
They came back from 2-1 down with two goals in the 93rd and 94th minute to win 3-2. Although United won their match against (my beloved) Sunderland, their disastrous choke in the previous three games of the season (when it looked like they had the trophy in both hands) meant they lost on goal difference.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
hisak
Sage of Shadow
Posts: 4,702
|
|
« #162964 on: May 13, 2012 » |
|
173,564
I was right!
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Ezlo's Apprentice
ThornSpell47
Posts: 6,993
|
|
« #162965 on: May 13, 2012 » |
|
173,565
Fun fact: There could only be one winner today. Unless United beat Sunderland 9-0 and City beat QPR 7-6. Then their goal difference and goals for and against would be equal and the title would have been decided by a play-off.
Premier League maths is fun!
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
hisak
Sage of Shadow
Posts: 4,702
|
|
« #162966 on: May 13, 2012 » |
|
173,566
Fun!
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Rew
The Hylian Grammarian
Subjecting innocents to Vogon poetry since 1980.
Posts: 1,750
|
|
« #162967 on: May 13, 2012 » |
|
173,567.
So basically it sounds like the equivalent of our Jacksonville Jaguars upsetting the New England Patriots to advance to the Super Bowl.
How many minutes are there in a football (soccer) match? 100?
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
hisak
Sage of Shadow
Posts: 4,702
|
|
« #162968 on: May 13, 2012 » |
|
173,568
90
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Ezlo's Apprentice
ThornSpell47
Posts: 6,993
|
|
« #162969 on: May 13, 2012 » |
|
173,569 90. Two halves of 45. Plus injury time.
(Unless it's a cup-tie, in which case a draw after 90 minutes can lead to a replay of another 90. Still a draw after that, then it's 30 minutes of extra-time in two halves of 15. Still a draw, it's a penalty shoot-out. Best of five shots each. Still nothing between the two sides after that then it's sudden death which goes on until one side misses and the other scores.
In most quarter-, semi-finals and finals, the replay is skipped and it's straight to the extra-time and pens.)
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
hisak
Sage of Shadow
Posts: 4,702
|
|
« #162970 on: May 13, 2012 » |
|
173,570
:o
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Rew
The Hylian Grammarian
Subjecting innocents to Vogon poetry since 1980.
Posts: 1,750
|
|
« #162971 on: May 13, 2012 » |
|
173,571.
Odd. But if the score was 2-1, then how could it have gotten to a 93rd minute since the game should've been over? Unless it was 1-1 at the end of 90? [/footballnoob]
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Ezlo's Apprentice
ThornSpell47
Posts: 6,993
|
|
« #162972 on: May 13, 2012 » |
|
173,572 90. Two halves of 45. Plus injury time.
Or more properly referred to as stoppage time. Since on this occasion, the time added was due to the Premier League's Number One Numpty (Joey Barton) hacking a player down, then getting a bit violent. It's his "thing".
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
hisak
Sage of Shadow
Posts: 4,702
|
|
« #162973 on: May 13, 2012 » |
|
173,573
Duh Rew!
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Ezlo's Apprentice
ThornSpell47
Posts: 6,993
|
|
« #162974 on: May 13, 2012 » |
|
173,574 *quietly hopes the questions are kept simple* Not often I'm able to be the smartest person in a football conversation. 
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
hisak
Sage of Shadow
Posts: 4,702
|
|
« #162975 on: May 13, 2012 » |
|
173,575
Just got strangely reminded of Retro's canceled football game...which of course is a completely different sport.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Rew
The Hylian Grammarian
Subjecting innocents to Vogon poetry since 1980.
Posts: 1,750
|
|
« #162976 on: May 13, 2012 » |
|
173,576. LOL, hisak. @EA: Oh, we Americans excel at making Brits look smart. 
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Ezlo's Apprentice
ThornSpell47
Posts: 6,993
|
|
« #162977 on: May 13, 2012 » |
|
173,577
Maybe I should pick up Inazuma Eleven. Looks kinda fun.
Some of my friends are SO into the sport, they play a game called Football Manager. They manage a whole club. Tactics, transfers. They can watch a whole 90 minute game scrolling through in text format.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Rew
The Hylian Grammarian
Subjecting innocents to Vogon poetry since 1980.
Posts: 1,750
|
|
« #162978 on: May 13, 2012 » |
|
173,578. Believe it or not, there is a football team in South Carolina. No, not the American football team(s). Genuine, rest-of-the-world type football. Not even called a soccer team but a football club. South Carolina United FCNo idea if they're any good or not, though. EDIT: Looking closer, it looks like it's for youths only. 
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
|
|