Bidet to you sir
That entire post boiled down to "I see it differently because of what I know to be true" and not once supported your claim that he's well informed with any examples of him making a strong well informed comment on an issue, all you've done is say "thats not his intent" or "he was his sarcastic" without a shred of evidence or then claimed "it's out of context".
I mean this basically boils down to "don't take him seriously" when you say he's offensive" and then act as if he's simply a different worldview when he's not being offensive.
You claim not to see the worst in people, you even claim not to see the worst in obama, but that doesn't mean you can simply shrug off all of what he's said as "entertainment"
I mean if you can't debate without simply going to platitudes I really don't know how to respond because all I'm doing is shouting at a brick wall.
This is my last post and these are my last comments.
Show some god damn proof of your assertion, stop using platitudes and "he's just being entertaining" as defenses of what he's said if you can't prove thats his intent.
It's one of the rules of this forum, prove your assertion or don't post.
Show how he's just as racist as the media.
Show how he clearly wasn't serious when he made that claim about the "ground zero mosque"
You're wrong on the university skull and bones thing, that "totalitarian blah blah" is an actual god damn thing he said, listen to it again, he said those exact words.
It was an outright lie Obama has never denied that america was "great", so it is a lie, just because obama can be critical of his own nation doesn't mean he doesn't think it's a great country.
I doubt he'd be president of it if he didn't think that.
How is comparing democrats to communists in anyway valid political discourse, explain? give me a good reason.
OH FOR GODS SAKE GENE, that was a direct response to a woman who said that states should secede and he said "we're not alone" we need a civil war.
While the second half may have said that america is divided and that it's "already in one", that doesn't stop from him actively stating the country needed a civil war, not in some sarcastic way, it was a dirrect affirmation of that womans opinion.
I do like how you go "I don't think the worst of people" and then accept that rush should be allowed to think the worst of liberals and say that they're happy a disaster where people died occured.
No he didn't make that case up but he was going "this shows how obamacare will ration care" I mean he's using one case of something to support the claim that healthcare reform will ration care to the extent people will die due to it.
I'm sorry but the non-profit section started halfway through the segment and the clip ended when he stopped talking, that was a full quotation, it was not cut off half way, and as I said he said "non-profits" not some, unless you're now saying "rush never means what he says and you should always read into it" theres no way I can possibly get from that segment that he didn't mean all non-profits.
I didn't say you believe many liberals think america deserved 9/11 I'm saying you defended rush for saying it, thats a different thing, and it's also very different from saying "some people deserved 9/11" you're supporting Rush in saying that one specific political group has a large number of people who think they deserved 9/11.
Reading comprehension is not your forte, neither is listening comprehension if you didn't actually hear the "totalitarian training section in that last section".
And on the last, yes rush is worse because his opinions are largely misinformed other radio hosts and tv hosts are not as bad and if their listenership is large, thats actively a good thing, if a radio personality spreads falsehoods and division, thats not.